Do you think Biden is “clean”?
No. But I also don't think the current president is "clean" either. I would argue politicians in general are historically questionable in the back room deals and being influenced by lobbyist. The severity of past or current missteps definitely influences "clean".
Do you see any issues with the dealings of his son?
Yes issue. Hunter Biden is his own person. Are you attempting to sway opinion by stating because the son does something bad that Joe Biden is a bad parent or is partially responsible for the actions?
Do you think Biden was wrong to withhold aid to Ukraine over his disapproval of the prosecuting attorney?
It's true that Joe Biden leveraged $1 billion in aid to persuade Ukraine to oust its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, in March 2016. But it wasn't because Shokin was investigating Burisma. It was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians.
As a result, Biden leveraged $1 billion in aid as "a stick to move Ukraine forward," Kupchan said. "He was acting alongside our European allies. Everybody was of a single mind that this prosecutor was not the right guy for the job."
Do you have any concerns over the dems 2016 election? From Hillary screwing over Bernie, to the use of the FBI and spying on her opponent?
Yes concerns - the investigations were definitely lacking on all accounts for numerous reasons. Are you trying to say past actions PROVE something currently? Because that is now how guilt and innocence works - but I will say i ~may show a pattern of behavior to watch for.
Do you consider the dossier they used to be genuine?
No - the FBI did wrong; or rather acted improper - this time for one candidate -- last time or next time could it be for against another candidate? Yes . How does it get fixed? More oversight, more transparency -- but it is tricky when the FBI is supposed to be the protector of domestic security.
Do you support Hillary deleting her emails after they had been subpoenaed?
When a person is in the public service sector it is difficult to draw a definitive line between "business" and "personal" . I would like to say I give her (or any politician) the benefit of the doubt that the emails were all personal. We also know in the IT world nothing is ever deleted, so I'm sure they were recovered and reviewed without much issue and found to be personal in nature.
Do you think it odd that Seth Rich worked for the DNC, was in contact with Wikileaks, had access to the information provided to Wikileaks, and was murdered in public?
This sequence of events definitely has some house of cards feel to it. Odd sure. Definitively an interesting sequence of events.
Does it bother you that big tech is censoring conservatives?
At a high level - yes. But it more nuanced that yes / no. When a group or person violates terms of service for a private service there is consequences. And sure you might point to 100s more examples of similar speech on the "other side". It is an all around bad scenario for everyone.
Does it concern you that dems and main stream media make villains of the folks that “stormed” the Capitol building yet support BLM riots, murders, burnings?
Wow - this could be a PHD level dissertation.
When a group of people plan and bring (build gallows); bring pipe bombs; molotovcocktails; yell for people to be hanged, beat someone to death with a fire extinguisher then yes the group is villainess and should be labeled as such. Unfortunately the few bad apples will spoil the basket.
BLM - There is SO much complexity to the racism problem in America. Grouping an entire movement for the actions of a few is a weak argument and comparison. Did some bad apples spoil the basket? Yep.
Does dems donating money to bail out arrested BLM and Antifa activists bother you?
No ; supporting people falsely arrested is ok by me; these people will still face a jury of their peers
Bail in general is used to suppress the poor
BLM is not Antifa
Antifa is not BLM